How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and IDA only?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Guatemala vs IDA only: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Guatemala

30.89 Mt CO2e

in 2023

IDA only

-104.45 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Guatemala rank

21st

IDA only rank

20th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Guatemala
IDA only

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 30.89 Mt CO2e against -104.45 Mt CO2e in IDA only, a difference of 135.34 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 21st and IDA only ranks 20th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and IDA only in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	IDA only	Difference	Ahead
2000s	30.89 Mt CO2e	-36.98 Mt CO2e	67.87 Mt CO2e	Guatemala
2010s	31 Mt CO2e	101.98 Mt CO2e	70.98 Mt CO2e	IDA only
2020s	33.82 Mt CO2e	-101.98 Mt CO2e	135.8 Mt CO2e	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Guatemala or IDA only?: Guatemala, at 30.89 Mt CO2e against -104.45 Mt CO2e in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Guatemala and IDA only?: 135.34 Mt CO2e, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and IDA only?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and IDA only rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Guatemala ranks 21st and IDA only ranks 20th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs IDA only: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/guatemala/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/guatemala/ida-only/">Guatemala vs IDA only: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.