How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Latvia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

IDA & IBRD total vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

IDA & IBRD total

-2,893 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Latvia

3.23 Mt CO2e

in 2023

IDA & IBRD total rank

45th

Latvia rank

43rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

IDA & IBRD total
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 3.23 Mt CO2e against -2,893 Mt CO2e in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 2,896 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IDA & IBRD total	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	-1,325 Mt CO2e	-9.69 Mt CO2e	1,316 Mt CO2e	Latvia
2010s	-2,150 Mt CO2e	-2.84 Mt CO2e	2,147 Mt CO2e	Latvia
2020s	-2,744 Mt CO2e	1.78 Mt CO2e	2,746 Mt CO2e	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, IDA & IBRD total or Latvia?: Latvia, at 3.23 Mt CO2e against -2,893 Mt CO2e in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between IDA & IBRD total and Latvia?: 2,896 Mt CO2e, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Latvia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Latvia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: IDA & IBRD total ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/ida-and-ibrd-total/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/ida-and-ibrd-total/latvia/">IDA & IBRD total vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.