Lesotho vs Low & middle income: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Lesotho
7.49 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Low & middle income
-1,405 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Lesotho rank
36th
Low & middle income rank
38th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Lesotho
  • Low & middle income
-1.0k01.0k2.0k200020112023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 7.49 Mt CO2e against -1,405 Mt CO2e in Low & middle income, a difference of 1,412 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 36th and Low & middle income ranks 38th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Low & middle income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Low & middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 7.55 Mt CO2e 566.01 Mt CO2e 558.46 Mt CO2e Low & middle income
2010s 7.49 Mt CO2e -655.73 Mt CO2e 663.22 Mt CO2e Lesotho
2020s 7.49 Mt CO2e -1,374 Mt CO2e 1,382 Mt CO2e Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Lesotho or Low & middle income?
Lesotho, at 7.49 Mt CO2e against -1,405 Mt CO2e in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Lesotho and Low & middle income?
1,412 Mt CO2e, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Low & middle income?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Low & middle income rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Lesotho ranks 36th and Low & middle income ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Low & middle income: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/lesotho/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/lesotho/low-and-middle-income/">Lesotho vs Low & middle income: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.