Lower middle income vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Lower middle income
-414.88 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
15.24 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Zimbabwe
-400-300-200-1000200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 15.24 Mt CO2e against -414.88 Mt CO2e in Lower middle income, a difference of 430.12 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s -237.58 Mt CO2e 8.46 Mt CO2e 246.04 Mt CO2e Zimbabwe
2010s -178.04 Mt CO2e 15.24 Mt CO2e 193.28 Mt CO2e Zimbabwe
2020s -420.27 Mt CO2e 15.24 Mt CO2e 435.51 Mt CO2e Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Lower middle income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 15.24 Mt CO2e against -414.88 Mt CO2e in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Lower middle income and Zimbabwe?
430.12 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Lower middle income ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/lower-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/lower-middle-income/zimbabwe/">Lower middle income vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.