Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Malawi
-0.562 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
-0.516 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Malawi rank
84th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
83rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Malawi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-0.55-0.5-0.45-0.4200020112023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -0.516 Mt CO2e against -0.562 Mt CO2e in Malawi, a difference of 0.046 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 84th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 83rd of 183 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s -0.562 Mt CO2e -0.4188 Mt CO2e 0.1432 Mt CO2e Sao Tome and Principe
2010s -0.562 Mt CO2e -0.4744 Mt CO2e 0.0876 Mt CO2e Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -0.562 Mt CO2e -0.516 Mt CO2e 0.046 Mt CO2e Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Malawi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -0.516 Mt CO2e against -0.562 Mt CO2e in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.046 Mt CO2e, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Malawi ranks 84th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.