How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Somalia vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Somalia

17.35 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Zimbabwe

15.24 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Somalia rank

27th

Zimbabwe rank

29th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Somalia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 17.35 Mt CO2e against 15.24 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.11 Mt CO2e.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.

Somalia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Somalia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	17.35 Mt CO2e	8.46 Mt CO2e	8.89 Mt CO2e	Somalia
2010s	17.35 Mt CO2e	15.24 Mt CO2e	2.11 Mt CO2e	Somalia
2020s	17.35 Mt CO2e	15.24 Mt CO2e	2.11 Mt CO2e	Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Somalia or Zimbabwe?: Somalia, at 17.35 Mt CO2e against 15.24 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Somalia and Zimbabwe?: 2.11 Mt CO2e, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Somalia and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Somalia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Somalia vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/somalia-fed-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/somalia-fed-rep/zimbabwe/">Somalia vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.