Jamaica vs Serbia and Montenegro: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Jamaica
-22.06 % change on previous year
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro
-14.56 % change on previous year
in 2005
Jamaica rank
208th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
205th
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Jamaica
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports -14.56 % change on previous year against -22.06 % change on previous year in Jamaica, a difference of 7.5 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 208th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 205th of 209 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.21 % change on previous year | -1.82 % change on previous year | 7.03 % change on previous year | Jamaica |
| 2000s | -9.71 % change on previous year | -5.84 % change on previous year | 3.86 % change on previous year | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Jamaica or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at -14.56 % change on previous year against -22.06 % change on previous year in Jamaica as of 2005.
- What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Jamaica and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 7.5 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Jamaica and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
- Jamaica ranks 208th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 205th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.