Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro
Serbia and Montenegro: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate was -14.56 % change on previous year in 2005. ◆ Volatile
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, 1993–2005
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2005, cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro stood at -14.56 % change on previous year. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 336,476.0% on the previous year and down 532.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 3.37 % change on previous year in 1995 and was at its lowest, -14.56 % change on previous year, in 2005.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 205th of 209 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | -3.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 0.387 % change on previous year | -112.5% |
| 1995 | 3.37 % change on previous year | +770.2% |
| 1996 | -1.1 % change on previous year | -132.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0959 % change on previous year | -108.7% |
| 1998 | -1.22 % change on previous year | -1375.9% |
| 1999 | -11.16 % change on previous year | +812.2% |
| 2000 | -11.46 % change on previous year | +2.8% |
| 2001 | -3.71 % change on previous year | -67.7% |
| 2002 | -2.36 % change on previous year | -36.3% |
| 2003 | -2.96 % change on previous year | +25.5% |
| 2004 | -0.0043 % change on previous year | -99.9% |
| 2005 | -14.56 % change on previous year | +336477.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | -336477.0% | -0.0043 % change on previous year | -14.56 % change on previous year |
| 1998 | -1375.9% | 0.0959 % change on previous year | -1.22 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.82 % change on previous year | -11.16 % change on previous year | 3.37 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | -5.84 % change on previous year | -14.56 % change on previous year | -0.0043 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro
- 202 Lesotho -12.06 % change on previous year compare
- 203 Brunei Darussalam -13.11 % change on previous year compare
- 204 French Polynesia -13.48 % change on previous year compare
- 206 North Macedonia -14.98 % change on previous year compare
- 207 Seychelles -18.1 % change on previous year compare
- 208 Jamaica -22.06 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Serbia and Montenegro
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2005)
- Standard Deviation 0.559 °C (2005)
- Temperature change 0.006 °C (2005)
- Inland waters — Area 17 1000 ha (2005)
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Use per value of agricultural production 37.31 g/Int$ (2005)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity 49,518 t (2005)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use 79,317 t (2005)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per area of cropland 20.75 kg/ha (2005)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity 73,373 t (2005)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use 91,825 t (2005)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro was -14.56 % change on previous year in 2005, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 3.37 % change on previous year in 1995.
- What is the lowest cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was -14.56 % change on previous year in 2005.
- How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 205th out of 209 countries with data for 2005.
- Is cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate rising or falling in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Over the last ten years it is down 532.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cattle — Losses from manure treated Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.