Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Cape Verde
0 square meters
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau
0 square meters
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
156th
Guinea-Bissau rank
156th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Cape Verde
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 square meters.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 156th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
| 2010s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Cape Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
- Cape Verde, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Guinea-Bissau as of 2017.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0 square meters, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Cape Verde ranks 156th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.