Consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Consumption-based deforestation per person was 0 square meters in 2023. ▬ Flat
Consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau, 2005–2023
Source: Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in square meters.
Analysis
In 2023, consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau stood at 0 square meters. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.
Over the whole period, consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau peaked at 0 square meters in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 square meters, in 2005.
That places Guinea-Bissau 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
- 153 Afghanistan 0.4774 square meters compare
- 154 Pakistan 0.3212 square meters compare
- 155 North Korea 0.2934 square meters compare
- 156 Antigua and Barbuda 0 square meters compare
- 156 Barbados 0 square meters compare
- 156 Cape Verde 0 square meters compare
- 156 Comoros 0 square meters compare
- 156 Dominica 0 square meters compare
- 156 East Timor 0 square meters compare
- 156 Eswatini 0 square meters compare
- 156 Fiji 0 square meters compare
- 156 Grenada 0 square meters compare
- 156 Guyana 0 square meters compare
- 156 Lesotho 0 square meters compare
- 156 Mauritius 0 square meters compare
- 156 New Caledonia 0 square meters compare
- 156 Puerto Rico 0 square meters compare
- 156 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 square meters compare
- 156 Saint Lucia 0 square meters compare
- 156 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 square meters compare
- 156 Solomon Islands 0 square meters compare
- 156 Suriname 0 square meters compare
- 156 Taiwan 0 square meters compare
- 156 Trinidad and Tobago 0 square meters compare
- 156 Vanuatu 0 square meters compare
More environment data for Guinea-Bissau
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF 3.19 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita 1.45 t CO2e/capita (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture 1.38 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) 0.3269 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) 0.2417 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) 0.0003 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF 2.3 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) 0.0001 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) 0.0013 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste 0.3567 Mt CO2e (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau?
- Consumption-based deforestation per person in Guinea-Bissau was 0 square meters in 2023, according to Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
- What is the lowest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.