Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia

Saint Lucia: Consumption-based deforestation per person was 0 square meters in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
0 square meters
World rank
156th
of 178 countries
All-time high
0 square meters
in 2005
All-time low
0 square meters
in 2005
Years of data
13
2005–2022

Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia, 2005–2022

00.20.40.60.812005201320222005: 0 square meters2006: 0 square meters2007: 0 square meters2008: 0 square meters2009: 0 square meters2010: 0 square meters2011: 0 square meters2012: 0 square meters2013: 0 square meters2014: 0 square meters2019: 0 square meters2020: 0 square meters2022: 0 square meters

Source: Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in square meters.

Analysis

The most recent figure for consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia is 0 square meters, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.

Over the whole period, consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia peaked at 0 square meters in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 square meters, in 2005.

Saint Lucia ranks 156th of 178 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters 5
2010s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters 6
2020s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters 2

Countries ranked near Saint Lucia

  1. 153 Afghanistan 0.4774 square meters compare
  2. 154 Pakistan 0.3212 square meters compare
  3. 155 North Korea 0.2934 square meters compare
  4. 156 Antigua and Barbuda 0 square meters compare
  5. 156 Barbados 0 square meters compare
  6. 156 Cape Verde 0 square meters compare
  7. 156 Comoros 0 square meters compare
  8. 156 Dominica 0 square meters compare
  9. 156 East Timor 0 square meters compare
  10. 156 Eswatini 0 square meters compare
  11. 156 Fiji 0 square meters compare
  12. 156 Grenada 0 square meters compare
  13. 156 Guinea-Bissau 0 square meters compare
  14. 156 Guyana 0 square meters compare
  15. 156 Lesotho 0 square meters compare
  16. 156 Mauritius 0 square meters compare
  17. 156 New Caledonia 0 square meters compare
  18. 156 Puerto Rico 0 square meters compare
  19. 156 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 square meters compare
  20. 156 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 square meters compare
  21. 156 Solomon Islands 0 square meters compare
  22. 156 Suriname 0 square meters compare
  23. 156 Taiwan 0 square meters compare
  24. 156 Trinidad and Tobago 0 square meters compare
  25. 156 Vanuatu 0 square meters compare

See the full ranking of 178 places →

More environment data for Saint Lucia

All data for Saint Lucia →

Frequently asked questions

What is consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia?
Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Lucia was 0 square meters in 2022, according to Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Saint Lucia?
The highest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
What is the lowest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Saint Lucia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
How does Saint Lucia rank for consumption-based deforestation per person?
Saint Lucia ranks 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2022.
Where does this Saint Lucia data come from?
The figures come from Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Consumption-based deforestation per person
Unit
square meters
Source
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
178 places, 3,320 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.