Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Kitts and Nevis: Consumption-based deforestation per person was 0 square meters in 2011. ▬ Flat
Latest (2011)
0 square meters
World rank
156th
of 178 countries
All-time high
0 square meters
in 2005
All-time low
0 square meters
in 2005
Years of data
7
2005–2011
Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, 2005–2011
Source: Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in square meters.
Analysis
Saint Kitts and Nevis recorded 0 square meters for consumption-based deforestation per person in 2011. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That places Saint Kitts and Nevis 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 2 |
Countries ranked near Saint Kitts and Nevis
- 153 Afghanistan 0.4774 square meters compare
- 154 Pakistan 0.3212 square meters compare
- 155 North Korea 0.2934 square meters compare
- 156 Antigua and Barbuda 0 square meters compare
- 156 Barbados 0 square meters compare
- 156 Cape Verde 0 square meters compare
- 156 Comoros 0 square meters compare
- 156 Dominica 0 square meters compare
- 156 East Timor 0 square meters compare
- 156 Eswatini 0 square meters compare
- 156 Fiji 0 square meters compare
- 156 Grenada 0 square meters compare
- 156 Guinea-Bissau 0 square meters compare
- 156 Guyana 0 square meters compare
- 156 Lesotho 0 square meters compare
- 156 Mauritius 0 square meters compare
- 156 New Caledonia 0 square meters compare
- 156 Puerto Rico 0 square meters compare
- 156 Saint Lucia 0 square meters compare
- 156 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 square meters compare
- 156 Solomon Islands 0 square meters compare
- 156 Suriname 0 square meters compare
- 156 Taiwan 0 square meters compare
- 156 Trinidad and Tobago 0 square meters compare
- 156 Vanuatu 0 square meters compare
More environment data for Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF 0.1855 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita 3.96 t CO2e/capita (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture 0.0111 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) 0 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) 0 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) 0 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF 0.043 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) 0.0001 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) 0.0002 Mt CO2e (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste 0.0316 Mt CO2e (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Consumption-based deforestation per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis was 0 square meters in 2011, according to Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- The highest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
- What is the lowest consumption-based deforestation per person recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 square meters in 2005.
- How does Saint Kitts and Nevis rank for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2011.
- Where does this Saint Kitts and Nevis data come from?
- The figures come from Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.