Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Consumption-based deforestation per person

Guinea-Bissau
0 square meters
in 2023
Mauritius
0 square meters
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau rank
156th
Mauritius rank
156th

Consumption-based deforestation per person over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.81200520142023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Mauritius, a difference of 0 square meters.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th and Mauritius ranks 156th of 178 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters
2010s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
0 square meters, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 156th and Mauritius ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Consumption-based deforestation per person
Unit
square meters
Source
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
178 places, 3,320 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.