Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Sweden: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Sweden
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 37,542 t against 35,016 t in Sweden, a difference of 2,526 t.
That makes Azerbaijan, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 69th of 185 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,820 t | 36,613 t | 20,793 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 23,924 t | 39,384 t | 15,461 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 28,110 t | 42,626 t | 14,516 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 36,781 t | 42,377 t | 5,597 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Sweden?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 37,542 t against 35,016 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sweden?
- 2,526 t, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sweden rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 69th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).