Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen in Sweden
Sweden: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen was 35,016 t in 2023. ▲ Rising
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen in Sweden, 1961–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Sweden recorded 35,016 t for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.7% on the previous year and down 16.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen in Sweden peaked at 49,531 t in 2019 and was at its lowest, 24,425 t, in 1966.
Sweden ranks 69th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen in Sweden, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,698 t | — |
| 1962 | 28,218 t | -8.1% |
| 1963 | 26,142 t | -7.4% |
| 1964 | 32,037 t | +22.6% |
| 1965 | 30,374 t | -5.2% |
| 1966 | 24,425 t | -19.6% |
| 1967 | 31,459 t | +28.8% |
| 1968 | 31,647 t | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 25,127 t | -20.6% |
| 1970 | 29,757 t | +18.4% |
| 1971 | 32,061 t | +7.7% |
| 1972 | 30,850 t | -3.8% |
| 1973 | 28,527 t | -7.5% |
| 1974 | 37,422 t | +31.2% |
| 1975 | 30,393 t | -18.8% |
| 1976 | 30,951 t | +1.8% |
| 1977 | 30,959 t | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 33,498 t | +8.2% |
| 1979 | 31,185 t | -6.9% |
| 1980 | 31,636 t | +1.4% |
| 1981 | 34,202 t | +8.1% |
| 1982 | 35,307 t | +3.2% |
| 1983 | 33,055 t | -6.4% |
| 1984 | 39,800 t | +20.4% |
| 1985 | 34,067 t | -14.4% |
| 1986 | 34,810 t | +2.2% |
| 1987 | 32,092 t | -7.8% |
| 1988 | 33,298 t | +3.8% |
| 1989 | 36,882 t | +10.8% |
| 1990 | 42,880 t | +16.3% |
| 1991 | 36,614 t | -14.6% |
| 1992 | 30,078 t | -17.9% |
| 1993 | 40,313 t | +34.0% |
| 1994 | 33,029 t | -18.1% |
| 1995 | 35,982 t | +8.9% |
| 1996 | 41,073 t | +14.1% |
| 1997 | 39,708 t | -3.3% |
| 1998 | 37,027 t | -6.8% |
| 1999 | 35,692 t | -3.6% |
| 2000 | 36,516 t | +2.3% |
| 2001 | 38,327 t | +5.0% |
| 2002 | 39,137 t | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 37,717 t | -3.6% |
| 2004 | 40,287 t | +6.8% |
| 2005 | 41,149 t | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 36,241 t | -11.9% |
| 2007 | 41,968 t | +15.8% |
| 2008 | 39,950 t | -4.8% |
| 2009 | 42,548 t | +6.5% |
| 2010 | 37,720 t | -11.3% |
| 2011 | 39,734 t | +5.3% |
| 2012 | 42,068 t | +5.9% |
| 2013 | 41,842 t | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 46,274 t | +10.6% |
| 2015 | 48,788 t | +5.4% |
| 2016 | 43,962 t | -9.9% |
| 2017 | 47,428 t | +7.9% |
| 2018 | 28,915 t | -39.0% |
| 2019 | 49,531 t | +71.3% |
| 2020 | 46,784 t | -5.5% |
| 2021 | 40,600 t | -13.2% |
| 2022 | 47,108 t | +16.0% |
| 2023 | 35,016 t | -25.7% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 35,016 t is above the median for high income countries, which is 6,154 t, 5.7× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 35,016 t is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 29,292 t, 1.2× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,903 t | 24,425 t | 32,037 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 31,560 t | 28,527 t | 37,422 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 34,515 t | 31,636 t | 39,800 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 37,240 t | 30,078 t | 42,880 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 39,384 t | 36,241 t | 42,548 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 42,626 t | 28,915 t | 49,531 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 42,377 t | 35,016 t | 47,108 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
- 66 Saudi Arabia 39,243 t compare
- 67 Austria 38,557 t compare
- 68 Azerbaijan 37,542 t compare
- 70 Guatemala 34,757 t compare
- 71 Cameroon 34,756 t compare
- 72 Belgium-Luxembourg 34,480 t compare
More environment data for Sweden
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 1.1 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -2.12 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.852 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.72 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 0.4367 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 2.27 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -0.0922 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen in Sweden?
- Crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen in Sweden was 35,016 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 49,531 t in 2019.
- What is the lowest crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 24,425 t in 1966.
- How does Sweden rank for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Sweden ranks 69th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).