Guatemala vs Sweden: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 35,016 t against 34,757 t in Guatemala, a difference of 259 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 69th of 185 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 612.87 t | 28,903 t | 28,290 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 1,226 t | 31,560 t | 30,335 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 2,846 t | 34,515 t | 31,669 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 4,380 t | 37,240 t | 32,860 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 7,540 t | 39,384 t | 31,844 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 19,032 t | 42,626 t | 23,594 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 32,472 t | 42,377 t | 9,906 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 35,016 t against 34,757 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Sweden?
- 259 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Sweden rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 69th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).