Angola vs Philippines: Deforestation embedded in trade
Angola
-6,006 hectares
in 2023
Philippines
-5,609 hectares
in 2023
Angola rank
161st
Philippines rank
159th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Angola
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports -5,609 hectares against -6,006 hectares in Angola, a difference of 397 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 161st and Philippines ranks 159th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,149 hectares | -6,222 hectares | 9,371 hectares | Angola |
| 2010s | -2,318 hectares | -1,255 hectares | 1,063 hectares | Philippines |
| 2020s | -23,400 hectares | -1,916 hectares | 21,485 hectares | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Angola or Philippines?
- Philippines, at -5,609 hectares against -6,006 hectares in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Angola and Philippines?
- 397 hectares, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Philippines?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Philippines rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Angola ranks 161st and Philippines ranks 159th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.