Armenia vs Sri Lanka: Deforestation embedded in trade
Armenia
2,241 hectares
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2,043 hectares
in 2023
Armenia rank
68th
Sri Lanka rank
70th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Armenia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 2,241 hectares against 2,043 hectares in Sri Lanka, a difference of 198 hectares.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 178 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 401.74 hectares | -1,301 hectares | 1,702 hectares | Armenia |
| 2010s | 594.11 hectares | -2,709 hectares | 3,303 hectares | Armenia |
| 2020s | 1,435 hectares | -541.16 hectares | 1,976 hectares | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Armenia or Sri Lanka?
- Armenia, at 2,241 hectares against 2,043 hectares in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Armenia and Sri Lanka?
- 198 hectares, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Sri Lanka?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Sri Lanka rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Armenia ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.