Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Deforestation embedded in trade
Armenia
2,241 hectares
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,081 hectares
in 2023
Armenia rank
68th
Zimbabwe rank
69th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Armenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 2,241 hectares against 2,081 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 160 hectares.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 178 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 401.74 hectares | 560.2 hectares | 158.46 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 594.11 hectares | 3,304 hectares | 2,710 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,435 hectares | 1,614 hectares | 178.89 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Armenia or Zimbabwe?
- Armenia, at 2,241 hectares against 2,081 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 160 hectares, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Armenia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.