Cape Verde vs Grenada: Deforestation embedded in trade
Cape Verde
-0.49 hectares
in 2017
Grenada
-0.19 hectares
in 2017
Cape Verde rank
130th
Grenada rank
128th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Cape Verde
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports -0.19 hectares against -0.49 hectares in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.3 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 130th and Grenada ranks 128th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.01 hectares | -7.35 hectares | 6.33 hectares | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | -0.9375 hectares | -0.8925 hectares | 0.045 hectares | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Cape Verde or Grenada?
- Grenada, at -0.19 hectares against -0.49 hectares in Cape Verde as of 2017.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Cape Verde and Grenada?
- 0.3 hectares, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Grenada?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Cape Verde and Grenada rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Cape Verde ranks 130th and Grenada ranks 128th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.