Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Deforestation embedded in trade
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1,604 hectares against 1,505 hectares in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 99 hectares.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Romania ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Romania ranks 88th of 178 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,536 hectares | 2,570 hectares | 1,035 hectares | Romania |
| 2010s | 1,632 hectares | 2,261 hectares | 628.45 hectares | Romania |
| 2020s | 1,380 hectares | 2,244 hectares | 863.56 hectares | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Equatorial Guinea or Romania?
- Romania, at 1,604 hectares against 1,505 hectares in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
- 99 hectares, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Romania rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Romania ranks 88th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.