Lithuania vs Zambia: Deforestation embedded in trade
Lithuania
295 hectares
in 2023
Zambia
242.33 hectares
in 2023
Lithuania rank
115th
Zambia rank
117th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Lithuania
- Zambia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 295 hectares against 242.33 hectares in Zambia, a difference of 52.67 hectares.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 117th of 178 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 869.82 hectares | -6,698 hectares | 7,568 hectares | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 933.58 hectares | -11,157 hectares | 12,091 hectares | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 557.87 hectares | -4,762 hectares | 5,320 hectares | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Lithuania or Zambia?
- Lithuania, at 295 hectares against 242.33 hectares in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Lithuania and Zambia?
- 52.67 hectares, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Zambia rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Lithuania ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 117th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.