Suriname vs East Timor: Deforestation embedded in trade
Suriname
-409.28 hectares
in 2023
East Timor
-49.66 hectares
in 2023
Suriname rank
143rd
East Timor rank
140th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Suriname
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports -49.66 hectares against -409.28 hectares in Suriname, a difference of 359.62 hectares.
Across all 19 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 140th of 178 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -272.11 hectares | -15.24 hectares | 256.87 hectares | East Timor |
| 2010s | -420.18 hectares | -35.9 hectares | 384.29 hectares | East Timor |
| 2020s | -480.53 hectares | -34.73 hectares | 445.8 hectares | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Suriname or East Timor?
- East Timor, at -49.66 hectares against -409.28 hectares in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Suriname and East Timor?
- 359.62 hectares, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and East Timor?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and East Timor rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Suriname ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 140th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.