Tajikistan vs Uganda: Deforestation embedded in trade
Tajikistan
2,320 hectares
in 2023
Uganda
2,302 hectares
in 2023
Tajikistan rank
66th
Uganda rank
67th
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Tajikistan
- Uganda
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 2,320 hectares against 2,302 hectares in Uganda, a difference of 18 hectares.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 67th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 180.2 hectares | -788.9 hectares | 969.1 hectares | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 243.94 hectares | -575.09 hectares | 819.03 hectares | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 1,228 hectares | 1,301 hectares | 73.73 hectares | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Tajikistan or Uganda?
- Tajikistan, at 2,320 hectares against 2,302 hectares in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Tajikistan and Uganda?
- 18 hectares, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Uganda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Uganda rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Tajikistan ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 67th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.