Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Freshwater Fish — Import quantity

Poland
278 1000 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1 1000 t
in 2023
Poland rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Freshwater Fish — Import quantity over time

  • Poland
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300201020162023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 278 1000 t against 1 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 277 1000 t.

That makes Poland's figure about 278.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 163 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 242.8 1000 t 1.1 1000 t 241.7 1000 t Poland
2020s 278 1000 t 1 1000 t 277 1000 t Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher freshwater fish — import quantity, Poland or United Republic of Tanzania?
Poland, at 278 1000 t against 1 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in freshwater fish — import quantity between Poland and United Republic of Tanzania?
277 1000 t, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Poland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for freshwater fish — import quantity?
Poland ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Freshwater Fish — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Freshwater Fish — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/freshwater-fish-import-quantity/poland/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/freshwater-fish-import-quantity/poland/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Freshwater Fish — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Freshwater Fish — Import quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 2,890 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.