Burundi vs Latvia: Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use

Burundi
0 t
in 2016
Latvia
0 t
in 2021
Burundi rank
44th
Latvia rank
44th

Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use over time

  • Burundi
  • Latvia
01020304050199620082021

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 2 t 1 t 1 t Burundi
2000s 0 t 9 t 9 t Latvia
2010s 0 t 30 t 30 t Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use, Burundi or Latvia?
Burundi, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2016.
What is the difference in fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use between Burundi and Latvia?
0 t, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Latvia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2016.
How do Burundi and Latvia rank globally for fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use?
Burundi ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Latvia: Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-diazines-morpholines-agricultural-use/burundi/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-diazines-morpholines-agricultural-use/burundi/latvia/">Burundi vs Latvia: Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
61 places, 912 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).