Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use in Latvia
Latvia: Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use was 0 t in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use in Latvia, 1997–2021
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use in Latvia is 0 t, measured in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use in Latvia peaked at 48 t in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 2020.
That places Latvia 44th out of 60 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use in Latvia, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 1 t | — |
| 1998 | 5 t | +400.0% |
| 2000 | 7 t | +40.0% |
| 2001 | 9 t | +28.6% |
| 2002 | 6 t | -33.3% |
| 2003 | 8 t | +33.3% |
| 2004 | 9 t | +12.5% |
| 2005 | 9 t | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 10 t | +11.1% |
| 2007 | 16 t | +60.0% |
| 2008 | 18 t | +12.5% |
| 2009 | 15 t | -16.7% |
| 2010 | 13 t | -13.3% |
| 2011 | 14 t | +7.7% |
| 2012 | 21 t | +50.0% |
| 2013 | 22 t | +4.8% |
| 2014 | 25 t | +13.6% |
| 2015 | 33 t | +32.0% |
| 2016 | 32 t | -3.0% |
| 2017 | 28 t | -12.5% |
| 2018 | 24 t | -14.3% |
| 2019 | 48 t | +100.0% |
| 2020 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 t | — |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0 t is below the median for high income countries, which is 5 t. (33 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0 t is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 5 t. (29 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +400.0% | 1 t | 5 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3 t | 1 t | 5 t | 2 |
| 2000s | 10.7 t | 6 t | 18 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 26 t | 13 t | 48 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 2 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 44 Bahrain 0 t
- 44 Bhutan 0 t
- 44 Burundi 0 t compare
- 44 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 44 Denmark 0 t compare
- 44 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 44 Estonia 0 t compare
- 44 Finland 0 t compare
- 44 Ghana 0 t compare
- 44 Iceland 0 t
- 44 Madagascar 0 t
- 44 Malta 0 t compare
- 44 Montenegro 0 t compare
- 44 Mozambique 0 t
- 44 Norway 0 t compare
- 44 Samoa 0 t
More environment data for Latvia
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.883 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.56 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual -0.4753 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate 0.0183 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use in Latvia?
- Fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use in Latvia was 0 t in 2021, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 48 t in 2019.
- What is the lowest fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 2020.
- How does Latvia rank for fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 44th out of 60 countries with data for 2021.
- Is fung & bact – diazines, morpholines — agricultural use rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Fung & Bact – Diazines, morpholines — Agricultural Use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).