Cuba vs Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Cuba
- Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK
How they compare
Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK currently reports 6.98 Percentage change against -5.17 Percentage change in Cuba, a difference of 12.15 Percentage change.
That makes Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK's figure about 1.4 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 30 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK ahead.
Cuba ranks 106th and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK ranks 108th of 168 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -2.95 Percentage change | -8.19 Percentage change | 5.25 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 1960s | 4.34 Percentage change | -5.15 Percentage change | 9.49 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 1970s | 2.69 Percentage change | -1.36 Percentage change | 4.04 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 1980s | 3 Percentage change | 2.18 Percentage change | 0.8217 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.1645 Percentage change | 2.85 Percentage change | 2.69 Percentage change | Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK |
| 2000s | -3.22 Percentage change | -4.87 Percentage change | 1.65 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 2010s | -1.24 Percentage change | -4.5 Percentage change | 3.26 Percentage change | Cuba |
| 2020s | -3.77 Percentage change | -0.6682 Percentage change | 3.1 Percentage change | Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Cuba or Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK?
- Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK, at 6.98 Percentage change against -5.17 Percentage change in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Cuba and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK?
- 12.15 Percentage change, with Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Cuba ranks 106th and Tulsa-Bartlesville, OK ranks 108th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org