Chalcidice vs Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time
- Chalcidice
- Guinea
How they compare
Chalcidice currently reports 6.53 Percentage change against -2.88 Percentage change in Guinea, a difference of 9.41 Percentage change.
That makes Chalcidice's figure about 2.3 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 33 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Guinea ahead.
Chalcidice ranks 99th and Guinea ranks 90th of 3112 regions.
Across the 8 decades both report, Chalcidice averaged higher in 5 and Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chalcidice | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.3829 Percentage change | 2.43 Percentage change | 2.04 Percentage change | Guinea |
| 1960s | 4.57 Percentage change | 0.6484 Percentage change | 3.92 Percentage change | Chalcidice |
| 1970s | 6.59 Percentage change | 2.78 Percentage change | 3.8 Percentage change | Chalcidice |
| 1980s | -0.2063 Percentage change | 0.7628 Percentage change | 0.9691 Percentage change | Guinea |
| 1990s | -0.0925 Percentage change | -0.0611 Percentage change | 0.0314 Percentage change | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.4527 Percentage change | -0.3334 Percentage change | 0.7861 Percentage change | Chalcidice |
| 2010s | 1.14 Percentage change | -0.6827 Percentage change | 1.82 Percentage change | Chalcidice |
| 2020s | -1.69 Percentage change | -4.75 Percentage change | 3.06 Percentage change | Chalcidice |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Chalcidice or Guinea?
- Chalcidice, at 6.53 Percentage change against -2.88 Percentage change in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Chalcidice and Guinea?
- 9.41 Percentage change, with Chalcidice ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chalcidice and Guinea?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Chalcidice and Guinea rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Chalcidice ranks 99th and Guinea ranks 90th of 3112 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org