Espírito Santo vs Papua New Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly

Espírito Santo
-3.97 Percentage change
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1.56 Percentage change
in 2025
Espírito Santo rank
34th
Papua New Guinea rank
34th

Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Espírito Santo
  • Papua New Guinea
-10010195019872025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1.56 Percentage change against -3.97 Percentage change in Espírito Santo, a difference of 5.53 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Espírito Santo ahead.

Espírito Santo ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 72 groups.

Across the 8 decades both report, Espírito Santo averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Espírito Santo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1950s -0.1513 Percentage change 0.2449 Percentage change 0.3963 Percentage change Papua New Guinea
1960s 0.5457 Percentage change -0.0297 Percentage change 0.5754 Percentage change Espírito Santo
1970s -1.55 Percentage change 0.3292 Percentage change 1.87 Percentage change Papua New Guinea
1980s 2.38 Percentage change 0.0313 Percentage change 2.35 Percentage change Espírito Santo
1990s -1.47 Percentage change -0.8164 Percentage change 0.6557 Percentage change Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0512 Percentage change 0.4401 Percentage change 0.3889 Percentage change Papua New Guinea
2010s -7.08 Percentage change 1.36 Percentage change 8.44 Percentage change Papua New Guinea
2020s -7.11 Percentage change 1.35 Percentage change 8.46 Percentage change Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Espírito Santo or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 1.56 Percentage change against -3.97 Percentage change in Espírito Santo as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Espírito Santo and Papua New Guinea?
5.53 Percentage change, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Espírito Santo and Papua New Guinea?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Espírito Santo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
Espírito Santo ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 72 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Espírito Santo vs Papua New Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/espirito-santo/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/espirito-santo/papua-new-guinea/">Espírito Santo vs Papua New Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,375 places, 256,500 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org