Hidalgo, R4 vs Papua New Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time
- Hidalgo, R4
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Hidalgo, R4 currently reports 11.56 Percentage change against 1.56 Percentage change in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 10 Percentage change.
That makes Hidalgo, R4's figure about 7.4 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 35 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Hidalgo, R4 ranks 32nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 3112 regions.
Across the 8 decades both report, Hidalgo, R4 averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hidalgo, R4 | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -3.1 Percentage change | 0.2449 Percentage change | 3.35 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 1960s | -10.05 Percentage change | -0.0297 Percentage change | 10.02 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 1.24 Percentage change | 0.3292 Percentage change | 0.9072 Percentage change | Hidalgo, R4 |
| 1980s | -2.75 Percentage change | 0.0313 Percentage change | 2.78 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 2.95 Percentage change | -0.8164 Percentage change | 3.77 Percentage change | Hidalgo, R4 |
| 2000s | 0.5703 Percentage change | 0.4401 Percentage change | 0.1301 Percentage change | Hidalgo, R4 |
| 2010s | 4.67 Percentage change | 1.36 Percentage change | 3.31 Percentage change | Hidalgo, R4 |
| 2020s | -1.75 Percentage change | 1.35 Percentage change | 3.1 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Hidalgo, R4 or Papua New Guinea?
- Hidalgo, R4, at 11.56 Percentage change against 1.56 Percentage change in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Hidalgo, R4 and Papua New Guinea?
- 10 Percentage change, with Hidalgo, R4 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hidalgo, R4 and Papua New Guinea?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Hidalgo, R4 and Papua New Guinea rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Hidalgo, R4 ranks 32nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 3112 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org