Liechtenstein vs Rio Grande do Sul: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time
- Liechtenstein
- Rio Grande do Sul
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0.7508 Percentage change against -4.96 Percentage change in Rio Grande do Sul, a difference of 5.71 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 38 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 42nd and Rio Grande do Sul ranks 39th of 191 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Liechtenstein averaged higher in 6 and Rio Grande do Sul in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Rio Grande do Sul | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -0.8881 Percentage change | -3.25 Percentage change | 2.36 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
| 1960s | -0.3538 Percentage change | -2.3 Percentage change | 1.95 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
| 1970s | 0.8791 Percentage change | -0.9348 Percentage change | 1.81 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
| 1980s | -0.284 Percentage change | 0.2372 Percentage change | 0.5212 Percentage change | Rio Grande do Sul |
| 1990s | 0.0188 Percentage change | 0.9504 Percentage change | 0.9316 Percentage change | Rio Grande do Sul |
| 2000s | 0.236 Percentage change | -0.501 Percentage change | 0.737 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 0.7099 Percentage change | -0.9836 Percentage change | 1.69 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 2.23 Percentage change | -5.96 Percentage change | 8.19 Percentage change | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Liechtenstein or Rio Grande do Sul?
- Liechtenstein, at 0.7508 Percentage change against -4.96 Percentage change in Rio Grande do Sul as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Liechtenstein and Rio Grande do Sul?
- 5.71 Percentage change, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Rio Grande do Sul?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Liechtenstein and Rio Grande do Sul rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Liechtenstein ranks 42nd and Rio Grande do Sul ranks 39th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org