Piura vs Zambia: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly

Piura
6.81 Percentage change
in 2025
Zambia
-2.98 Percentage change
in 2025
Piura rank
93rd
Zambia rank
93rd

Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Piura
  • Zambia
-20020195019872025

How they compare

Piura currently reports 6.81 Percentage change against -2.98 Percentage change in Zambia, a difference of 9.79 Percentage change.

That makes Piura's figure about 2.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Zambia ahead.

Piura ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 93rd of 3112 regions.

Across the 8 decades both report, Piura averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Piura Zambia Difference Ahead
1950s -5.15 Percentage change -6.4 Percentage change 1.25 Percentage change Piura
1960s -7.4 Percentage change -3.42 Percentage change 3.98 Percentage change Zambia
1970s -0.9896 Percentage change 2.22 Percentage change 3.21 Percentage change Zambia
1980s -0.1393 Percentage change 1.89 Percentage change 2.02 Percentage change Zambia
1990s 2.45 Percentage change -1.19 Percentage change 3.65 Percentage change Piura
2000s -3.22 Percentage change -0.5261 Percentage change 2.69 Percentage change Zambia
2010s -2.2 Percentage change -0.0839 Percentage change 2.11 Percentage change Zambia
2020s -1.74 Percentage change -2.6 Percentage change 0.8587 Percentage change Piura

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Piura or Zambia?
Piura, at 6.81 Percentage change against -2.98 Percentage change in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Piura and Zambia?
9.79 Percentage change, with Piura ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Piura and Zambia?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Piura and Zambia rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
Piura ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 93rd of 3112 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Piura vs Zambia: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/piura/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/piura/zambia/">Piura vs Zambia: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,375 places, 256,500 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org