Ravenna vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly over time
- Ravenna
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Ravenna currently reports 11.98 Percentage change against 2.19 Percentage change in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 9.79 Percentage change.
That makes Ravenna's figure about 5.5 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Ravenna ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 3112 regions.
Across the 8 decades both report, Ravenna averaged higher in 7 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ravenna | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1.01 Percentage change | -5.19 Percentage change | 6.2 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 1960s | 3.72 Percentage change | -3.4 Percentage change | 7.12 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 1970s | 6.38 Percentage change | -1.17 Percentage change | 7.55 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 1980s | 2.19 Percentage change | 2.05 Percentage change | 0.1357 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 1990s | -3.57 Percentage change | -3.66 Percentage change | 0.0895 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 2000s | 0.638 Percentage change | -0.0358 Percentage change | 0.6738 Percentage change | Ravenna |
| 2010s | 2.04 Percentage change | 2.65 Percentage change | 0.6097 Percentage change | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | -0.7325 Percentage change | -1.11 Percentage change | 0.3799 Percentage change | Ravenna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly, Ravenna or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Ravenna, at 11.98 Percentage change against 2.19 Percentage change in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly between Ravenna and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9.79 Percentage change, with Ravenna ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ravenna and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Ravenna and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Ravenna ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 3112 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org