Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area

Burkina Faso
8.18 kg/ha
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8.76 kg/ha
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8.76 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 201 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.16 kg/ha 20.57 kg/ha 18.42 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1970s 2.76 kg/ha 21.1 kg/ha 18.33 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1980s 4.43 kg/ha 15.11 kg/ha 10.68 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1990s 5.33 kg/ha 13.17 kg/ha 7.84 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2000s 7.13 kg/ha 7.54 kg/ha 0.4074 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2010s 8.22 kg/ha 8.92 kg/ha 0.6975 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2020s 7.01 kg/ha 8.96 kg/ha 1.95 kg/ha Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8.76 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
0.58 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).