Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area was 8.76 kg/ha in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
8.76 kg/ha
Change on year
up 7.4%
World rank
152nd
of 186 countries
All-time high
24.63 kg/ha
in 1971
All-time low
4.96 kg/ha
in 2008
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023

510152025196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kg/ha.

Analysis

Zimbabwe recorded 8.76 kg/ha for input — cropland potassium per unit area in 2023.

The figure is up 7.4% on the previous year and up 19.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, input — cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe peaked at 24.63 kg/ha in 1971 and was at its lowest, 4.96 kg/ha, in 2008.

Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 186 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe, 1961 to 2023.
Year kg/ha Change
1961 19.45 kg/ha —
1962 19.83 kg/ha +2.0%
1963 20.65 kg/ha +4.1%
1964 19.79 kg/ha -4.1%
1965 19.77 kg/ha -0.1%
1966 20.35 kg/ha +2.9%
1967 20.09 kg/ha -1.3%
1968 22.2 kg/ha +10.5%
1969 23.03 kg/ha +3.8%
1970 23.91 kg/ha +3.8%
1971 24.63 kg/ha +3.0%
1972 24.1 kg/ha -2.1%
1973 24.13 kg/ha +0.1%
1974 24.34 kg/ha +0.9%
1975 21.48 kg/ha -11.8%
1976 19.47 kg/ha -9.3%
1977 16.91 kg/ha -13.2%
1978 17.01 kg/ha +0.6%
1979 14.99 kg/ha -11.9%
1980 18.18 kg/ha +21.3%
1981 16.86 kg/ha -7.2%
1982 15.18 kg/ha -10.0%
1983 15.21 kg/ha +0.2%
1984 13.01 kg/ha -14.4%
1985 15.06 kg/ha +15.8%
1986 14.53 kg/ha -3.6%
1987 14.32 kg/ha -1.4%
1988 14.66 kg/ha +2.4%
1989 14.11 kg/ha -3.8%
1990 13.77 kg/ha -2.4%
1991 12.86 kg/ha -6.6%
1992 11.59 kg/ha -9.9%
1993 12.77 kg/ha +10.2%
1994 12.98 kg/ha +1.7%
1995 11.98 kg/ha -7.7%
1996 13.3 kg/ha +11.0%
1997 13.52 kg/ha +1.7%
1998 14.55 kg/ha +7.6%
1999 14.38 kg/ha -1.1%
2000 11.91 kg/ha -17.2%
2001 12.67 kg/ha +6.4%
2002 7.51 kg/ha -40.7%
2003 7.61 kg/ha +1.3%
2004 6.17 kg/ha -18.8%
2005 5.96 kg/ha -3.4%
2006 6.97 kg/ha +17.0%
2007 6.44 kg/ha -7.6%
2008 4.96 kg/ha -23.0%
2009 5.15 kg/ha +3.7%
2010 6.95 kg/ha +35.1%
2011 6.22 kg/ha -10.4%
2012 6.19 kg/ha -0.6%
2013 7.31 kg/ha +18.2%
2014 8.16 kg/ha +11.6%
2015 7.71 kg/ha -5.5%
2016 9.85 kg/ha +27.8%
2017 12.02 kg/ha +22.0%
2018 12.14 kg/ha +1.1%
2019 12.65 kg/ha +4.1%
2020 8.78 kg/ha -30.6%
2021 10.16 kg/ha +15.8%
2022 8.15 kg/ha -19.7%
2023 8.76 kg/ha +7.4%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 8.76 kg/ha is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 16.59 kg/ha, 53% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 8.76 kg/ha is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 8.43 kg/ha, 1.0× the median. (43 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 20.57 kg/ha 19.45 kg/ha 23.03 kg/ha 9
1970s 21.1 kg/ha 14.99 kg/ha 24.63 kg/ha 10
1980s 15.11 kg/ha 13.01 kg/ha 18.18 kg/ha 10
1990s 13.17 kg/ha 11.59 kg/ha 14.55 kg/ha 10
2000s 7.54 kg/ha 4.96 kg/ha 12.67 kg/ha 10
2010s 8.92 kg/ha 6.19 kg/ha 12.65 kg/ha 10
2020s 8.96 kg/ha 8.15 kg/ha 10.16 kg/ha 4

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 149 Uganda 9.65 kg/ha compare
  2. 150 Azerbaijan 9.38 kg/ha compare
  3. 151 Senegal 8.96 kg/ha compare
  4. 153 Angola 8.43 kg/ha compare
  5. 154 Namibia 8.37 kg/ha compare
  6. 155 Burkina Faso 8.18 kg/ha compare

See the full ranking of 233 places →

More environment data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is input — cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe?
Input — cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe was 8.76 kg/ha in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest input — cropland potassium per unit area recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 24.63 kg/ha in 1971.
What is the lowest input — cropland potassium per unit area recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 4.96 kg/ha in 2008.
How does Zimbabwe rank for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
Zimbabwe ranks 152nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
Is input — cropland potassium per unit area rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 19.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/zimbabwe/">Input — Cropland potassium per unit area in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).