Malawi vs Puerto Rico: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 13.33 kg/ha against 12.97 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.36 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 65th and Puerto Rico ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5378 kg/ha | 7.03 kg/ha | 6.5 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 0.9996 kg/ha | 13.32 kg/ha | 12.32 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 1.6 kg/ha | 15.04 kg/ha | 13.44 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 1.96 kg/ha | 19.34 kg/ha | 17.38 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 2.73 kg/ha | 15.85 kg/ha | 13.12 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 5.16 kg/ha | 16.17 kg/ha | 11 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 9.23 kg/ha | 14.57 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malawi or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 13.33 kg/ha against 12.97 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malawi and Puerto Rico?
- 0.36 kg/ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Puerto Rico rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 65th and Puerto Rico ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).