Malawi vs Tuvalu: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 12.97 kg/ha against 12.63 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.34 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Malawi ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5378 kg/ha | 3.79 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 0.9996 kg/ha | 3.86 kg/ha | 2.86 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 1.6 kg/ha | 5.68 kg/ha | 4.08 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 1.96 kg/ha | 9.11 kg/ha | 7.15 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 2.73 kg/ha | 11.84 kg/ha | 9.11 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 5.16 kg/ha | 12.3 kg/ha | 7.13 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 9.23 kg/ha | 12.59 kg/ha | 3.36 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malawi or Tuvalu?
- Malawi, at 12.97 kg/ha against 12.63 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 0.34 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tuvalu rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).