How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tuvalu?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Tuvalu: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Ecuador

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Tuvalu

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

92nd

Tuvalu rank

93rd

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Ecuador
Tuvalu

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and Tuvalu ranks 93rd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Tuvalu
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Tuvalu
1990s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Tuvalu
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Ecuador or Tuvalu?: Ecuador, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Ecuador and Tuvalu?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tuvalu?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tuvalu rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Ecuador ranks 92nd and Tuvalu ranks 93rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tuvalu: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tuvalu/">Ecuador vs Tuvalu: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.