How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Lithuania: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)

Croatia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia rank

83rd

Lithuania rank

85th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt) over time

Croatia
Lithuania

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 83rd and Lithuania ranks 85th of 193 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt), Croatia or Lithuania?: Croatia, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt) between Croatia and Lithuania?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Lithuania rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt)?: Croatia ranks 83rd and Lithuania ranks 85th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Lithuania: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/croatia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/croatia/lithuania/">Croatia vs Lithuania: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 19 September 2026

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.