Central Asia vs Ecuador: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Central Asia
-9.58 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador
38.67 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central Asia rank
30th
Ecuador rank
28th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Central Asia
  • Ecuador
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 38.67 % change on previous year against -9.58 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 48.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 4.0 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ecuador ahead.

Central Asia ranks 30th and Ecuador ranks 28th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 47.45 % change on previous year 18.95 % change on previous year 28.5 % change on previous year Central Asia
2000s 14.07 % change on previous year 8.51 % change on previous year 5.56 % change on previous year Central Asia
2010s 14.24 % change on previous year 17.33 % change on previous year 3.08 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 4.3 % change on previous year 7.7 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Central Asia or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 38.67 % change on previous year against -9.58 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Central Asia and Ecuador?
48.25 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Central Asia and Ecuador rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Central Asia ranks 30th and Ecuador ranks 28th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Ecuador: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/ecuador/">Central Asia vs Ecuador: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.