Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Costa Rica
104,337 t
in 2024
New Zealand
132,218 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
New Zealand rank
33rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Costa Rica
  • New Zealand
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 132,218 t against 104,337 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 27,881 t.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 33rd of 212 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 7,212 t 83,842 t 76,630 t New Zealand
1970s 18,097 t 135,892 t 117,795 t New Zealand
1980s 22,120 t 105,390 t 83,270 t New Zealand
1990s 43,780 t 125,340 t 81,560 t New Zealand
2000s 62,975 t 140,355 t 77,380 t New Zealand
2010s 42,012 t 128,530 t 86,519 t New Zealand
2020s 65,543 t 134,783 t 69,240 t New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 132,218 t against 104,337 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
27,881 t, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Costa Rica ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/costa-rica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/costa-rica/new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.