Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled was 104,337 t in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
104,337 t
Change on year
up 56.7%
World rank
34th
of 212 countries
All-time high
104,337 t
in 2024
All-time low
4,204 t
in 1962
Years of data
64
1961–2024

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica, 1961–2024

025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t.

Analysis

Costa Rica recorded 104,337 t for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in 2024. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.

That represents a change of up 56.7% on the previous year and up 191.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Costa Rica peaked at 104,337 t in 2024 and was at its lowest, 4,204 t, in 1962.

That places Costa Rica 34th out of 212 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2024.
Year t Change
1961 4,207 t
1962 4,204 t -0.1%
1963 4,500 t +7.0%
1964 4,500 t +0.0%
1965 10,000 t +122.2%
1966 7,600 t -24.0%
1967 8,900 t +17.1%
1968 12,000 t +34.8%
1969 9,000 t -25.0%
1970 6,000 t -33.3%
1971 8,550 t +42.5%
1972 12,000 t +40.4%
1973 20,000 t +66.7%
1974 26,600 t +33.0%
1975 20,000 t -24.8%
1976 16,820 t -15.9%
1977 16,000 t -4.9%
1978 28,000 t +75.0%
1979 27,000 t -3.6%
1980 20,000 t -25.9%
1981 17,000 t -15.0%
1982 10,200 t -40.0%
1983 20,300 t +99.0%
1984 28,700 t +41.4%
1985 20,000 t -30.3%
1986 19,000 t -5.0%
1987 30,000 t +57.9%
1988 26,000 t -13.3%
1989 30,000 t +15.4%
1990 38,000 t +26.7%
1991 38,000 t +0.0%
1992 41,800 t +10.0%
1993 30,000 t -28.2%
1994 32,000 t +6.7%
1995 32,000 t +0.0%
1996 32,000 t +0.0%
1997 60,000 t +87.5%
1998 62,000 t +3.3%
1999 72,000 t +16.1%
2000 70,000 t -2.8%
2001 45,750 t -34.6%
2002 47,500 t +3.8%
2003 84,083 t +77.0%
2004 71,277 t -15.2%
2005 53,891 t -24.4%
2006 81,767 t +51.7%
2007 72,855 t -10.9%
2008 80,418 t +10.4%
2009 22,212 t -72.4%
2010 38,489 t +73.3%
2011 43,599 t +13.3%
2012 38,140 t -12.5%
2013 29,570 t -22.5%
2014 35,775 t +21.0%
2015 50,335 t +40.7%
2016 40,042 t -20.4%
2017 48,866 t +22.0%
2018 49,166 t +0.6%
2019 46,133 t -6.2%
2020 44,688 t -3.1%
2021 45,750 t +2.4%
2022 66,349 t +45.0%
2023 66,593 t +0.4%
2024 104,337 t +56.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 7,212 t 4,204 t 12,000 t 9
1970s 18,097 t 6,000 t 28,000 t 10
1980s 22,120 t 10,200 t 30,000 t 10
1990s 43,780 t 30,000 t 72,000 t 10
2000s 62,975 t 22,212 t 84,083 t 10
2010s 42,012 t 29,570 t 50,335 t 10
2020s 65,543 t 44,688 t 104,337 t 5

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 31 Egypt 140,200 t compare
  2. 32 Italy 138,934 t compare
  3. 33 New Zealand 132,218 t compare
  4. 35 Guatemala 96,961 t compare
  5. 36 China, Taiwan Province of 96,795 t compare
  6. 37 Republic of Korea 93,268 t compare

See the full ranking of 243 places →

More environment data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Costa Rica?
Nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Costa Rica was 104,337 t in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 104,337 t in 2024.
What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 4,204 t in 1962.
How does Costa Rica rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Costa Rica ranks 34th out of 212 countries with data for 2024.
Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 191.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/costa-rica/">Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.