Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services

Eswatini
38 %
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
37 %
in 2024
Eswatini rank
108th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
109th

Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 38 % against 37 % in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1 %.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 108th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 133 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 29.6 % 28 % 1.6 % Eswatini
2010s 34.6 % 33 % 1.6 % Eswatini
2020s 37.6 % 36.2 % 1.4 % Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Eswatini, at 38 % against 37 % in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
1 %, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services?
Eswatini ranks 108th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-percent-value/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-percent-value/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
172 places, 4,261 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.