French Polynesia vs Grenada: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services
Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services over time
- French Polynesia
- Grenada
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 90 % against 90 % in Grenada, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 53rd and Grenada ranks 53rd of 141 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 % | 82.7 % | 7.3 % | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 90 % | 89.62 % | 0.375 % | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services, French Polynesia or Grenada?
- French Polynesia, at 90 % against 90 % in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services between French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 0 %, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do French Polynesia and Grenada rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services?
- French Polynesia ranks 53rd and Grenada ranks 53rd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.