Sao Tome and Principe vs Tonga: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services

Sao Tome and Principe
37 %
in 2024
Tonga
30 %
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
109th
Tonga rank
112th

Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Tonga
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 37 % against 30 % in Tonga, a difference of 7 %.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th and Tonga ranks 112th of 133 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 28 % 29 % 1 % Tonga
2010s 33 % 29.9 % 3.1 % Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 36.2 % 30 % 6.2 % Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services, Sao Tome and Principe or Tonga?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 37 % against 30 % in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services between Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
7 %, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th and Tonga ranks 112th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Tonga: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-percent-value/sao-tome-and-principe/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-percent-value/sao-tome-and-principe/tonga/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Tonga: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
172 places, 4,261 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.