Nepal vs Suriname: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Nepal
51.67
in 2025
Suriname
51.19
in 2025
Nepal rank
103rd
Suriname rank
105th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Nepal
- Suriname
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 51.67 against 51.19 in Suriname, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Nepal ranks 103rd and Suriname ranks 105th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.67 | 51.19 | 6.52 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 51.66 | 51.19 | 0.474 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 51.67 | 51.19 | 0.48 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Nepal or Suriname?
- Nepal, at 51.67 against 51.19 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Nepal and Suriname?
- 0.48, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Suriname rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Nepal ranks 103rd and Suriname ranks 105th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.