Dominican Republic vs El Salvador: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Dominican Republic
- El Salvador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 16.25 million USD against 14.7 million USD in El Salvador, a difference of 1.55 million USD.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 53rd and El Salvador ranks 54th of 79 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.68 million USD | 2.46 million USD | 50.22 million USD | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 61.39 million USD | 7.02 million USD | 54.37 million USD | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Dominican Republic or El Salvador?
- Dominican Republic, at 16.25 million USD against 14.7 million USD in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
- 1.55 million USD, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and El Salvador rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 53rd and El Salvador ranks 54th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.