Georgia vs Iceland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Georgia
- Iceland
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 82.85 million USD against 62.9 million USD in Iceland, a difference of 19.95 million USD.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
Georgia ranks 36th and Iceland ranks 37th of 79 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.64 million USD | 25.08 million USD | 19.43 million USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 22.19 million USD | 34.15 million USD | 11.96 million USD | Iceland |
| 2020s | 61.1 million USD | 53.95 million USD | 7.15 million USD | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Georgia or Iceland?
- Georgia, at 82.85 million USD against 62.9 million USD in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Georgia and Iceland?
- 19.95 million USD, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Georgia ranks 36th and Iceland ranks 37th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.