Grenada vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Grenada
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 1.35 million USD against 0.57 million USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.78 million USD.
That makes Grenada's figure about 2.4 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 66th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 69th of 79 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1 million USD | 0.35 million USD | 0.755 million USD | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.3167 million USD | 0.4633 million USD | 0.1467 million USD | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Grenada or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Grenada, at 1.35 million USD against 0.57 million USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.78 million USD, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Grenada ranks 66th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 69th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.